MetalMan 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

For me, I have 6 and there's a game I wouldn't buy alone in the list, but I have it because I bought a Wii bundle that includes 5 games and 2 controls and a 1GB memory stick.


Wii Sports (Every Wii owner should have this since that's what the Wii itself includes)
Zelda: Twilight Princess (Fun)
Super Monkey Ball (Fun)
Madden (Not interested...but it might be interesting to see how it works with the Wii remote)
Trauma Center (I need to try this out)
Marvel Ultimate Alliance (Need to try this one out too)


EDIT: And yes, I have finally posted outside of my introduction topic!

kalajel 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

Alas, I do not own a Nintendo Wii. I really should get my hands on a new console; the last one I bought was a Nintendo 64…

Runagi 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

Lol, my only Wii game right now is Zelda. I am teh broke atm. And not interested long enough in console games to detract me from WoW.

*Smokes a WoW blunt*

*Exhales happily*

IdyotAko 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

For Ruru to use a blunt as a reference to WoW is a definite truth...

Good thing I smoked it and just stepped away. I never was a smoker in the first place...

I don't have a Wii... but I may get one in the future if they bring out a very good reason for me to get one. Right now, I'm on the fence...

Runagi 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

Reason?
1) Zelda
2) Super Smash Bros.:Brawl
3) Old Skool Games like Super Castlevania IV
4) ? ? ?
5)

Yep. Reason enough for me.

Israel 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

which one costs more? psp or wii?

kalajel 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

Probably the psp, it's a portable game and it's been out for what, a year, a year and a half? But I think the best bet would still be a wii.

MetalMan 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

The Wii is more worthwhile than the PSP IMO. Sure it's odd comparing a handheld to a console but I'm gonna make an exception. The PSP doesn't have that many interesting games, I only bought it for the Mega Man 1 and X1 remake (Which are both very amazing).

Wii has Super Smash Bros Brawl and Zelda TP! So this is definitely a better deal. (I'm hoping SSBB to be good which is likely)


EDIT: Oh yeah. Virtual Console (classic games for the win!) AND you can play your gamecube games on there. So there's no need to buy a Gamecube and a Wii if you want Gamecube games. You'd just need the memory cards and the controllers.

Israel 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

i havent touvhed a wee before, does it have those classic games or just new games created for wee? does it have similarities with the old SNES? Do u use cartridges or CDs?

MetalMan 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

Nintendo Wii has both new and old games. And you use CDs not cartridges. And the controller is very unique, it looks like a remote but eh...You should take a look at some gaming site to see! I have the Wii and I think it's amazing so far!

kalajel 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

Just remember that when wielding the wiimote, you don't have to swing it like crazy to obtain result (just a flick of the wrist is enough to get a fastball in baseball), otherwise you may end up like all those other morons with a broken T.V. and wiimote…>_>;

MetalMan 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

Indeed.


The Wii Sport's Boxing game is fun as hell by the way =D!

Israel 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

lol, i used to swing the controler together with my body the first time i played the PS console, btw Ps3 is out, would you think that Wii cant compete with the new console?

MetalMan 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

The PS3 and Wii is doing fine here in America from what I've heard. In fact, the Wii has been constantly getting sold out (even within minutes a new batch of Wiis gets into a store) so that's saying something about how well the Wii is doing =D

IdyotAko 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

Wii's biggest selling point is it's price, but it's not exactly next-gen, so it'll be a matter of time when most of the stuff that comes out for it will look dated (and not that I hate the Wii, I like it a lot) to the point that PS2 graphics actually look better.

PS3 is no doubt the most powerful of the bunch, it just the fact that it's price point is fairly high, although we know that Sony is actually losing money for every PS3 sold. With the technology in the console, it could have easily been sold for close to a grand.

The 360 has done well for itself, but the intended release of the Elite might screw things up for Microsoft. If they were intending to release the system like this, they should have done it when they first release the 360. For folks that doesn't have a 360 though, it's a good deal. And let's not forget that the 360 bombed here in Japan.

The true winner of the console war will be decided by next year. Who knows who will win... but us as consumers actually win in the end.

kalajel 19 years 7 months ago wrote:

I don't really think there is a console war as such, at least not in the "ol' glory days" when it was Nintendo vs Sega (I'm still laughing at all those loosers who bought a Sega Master System…). Today, most gamers buy all three consoles (it's not rare when I go at a friend's house to see a Playstation/PSII/PSIII next to a Game Cube/Wii next to an Xbox/360).

IdyotAko 19 years 6 months ago wrote:

That is what you would call a hardcore gamer.

Or someone that can afford to get all the systems. You must realize though that these type of folks only make up about 5-10% of the total gaming populus. The rest of the folks can barely afford one system, let alone all three.

But I do agree about the good ole' days with Sega and Nintendo. Guess we know who won that war... hehehe...